bg_serviceupA couple of exciting products just landed in the warehouse that got us running to open the boxes. We peered in, mouths open wide, breaths held as we pulled out the goodies that had kept to us on the edges of our seats all week in anticipation of there arrival. I am glad to inform you that we are not disappointed.

First out of the boxes were the Carbonsports Lightweight wheelsets. They are everything that we hoped they would be, just to look at they show a quality and design that we had not seen before in a wheel manufacturer. From the overall carbon design of the wheels to the little details like the computer magnet moulded into the rim and the DT Swiss Hugi internals in the freehub body, it looks like they have a great package on offer.

Bike Radar posted a review on the Lightweight Standard III wheelset, this is what they had to say:

BikeRadar verdict [RATING:4]logo_bikeradar

“Extraordinarily light, stiff and aero…and extraordinarily expensive”

By James Huang, technical editor

CarbonSports’ Lightweight carbon wheels can be found on a substantial number of notable ProTour riders’ bikes past and present regardless of their official wheel sponsor. Can they possibly be that good?

The recipe

CarbonSports’ Lightweight Standard Generation III is one of a growing number of wheelsets that promises to combine the typically mutually exclusive attributes of light weight, aerodynamics and stiffness.

On the weight side, the numbers are compelling: our SRAM/Shimano test set arrived with Continental Competition tubulars, yet weighed just 1620g for the pair without skewers. Once you back out the typical weight of the rubber, the associated valve extenders and glue, the weight is just about spot-on with Lightweight’s claimed figure of 1075g. Bam!

True to its name, CarbonSports makes liberal use of carbon fibre for both the wind-cutting 53mm-deep V-shaped full-carbon tubular rim and both hub shells. The lens-shaped spokes are also 100 percent carbon, an upgrade from the previous generation’s carbon-and-aramid blend. All of the bits are then assembled by hand and co-moulded together to create a single structure.

About the only non-carbon bits lie within the hubs. CarbonSports uses DT Swiss 240s internals, which include the alloy freehub body (easily interchangeable between Shimano/SRAM and Campagnolo), star ratchet drivers, cartridge bearings and alloy axles and end caps.

bg_werkstatt2Noteworthy details include a small magnet moulded right into the rim for use with a cycle computer as well as a small embedded memory chip that stores each individual wheel’s serial number, production conditions and trueness as it left the factory.

The taste test

Even with its impressively low mass and aero-looking shape, a US$4,500 price tag carries some high expectations but we quickly realised just what it is about the Lightweights that makes them so highly prized among the pros. Far and away, the wheelset’s overwhelming characteristic is its rigidity, both torsional and lateral.

CarbonSports claims the new carbon spokes add 30 percent more stiffness as compared to Generation II, and this is backed up by the ride. The Lightweights offer up a sense of ‘right now’ urgency under power that eclipses nearly every other high-end race wheel we’ve tested. In addition, there is absolutely no sideways wag or wobble when sprinting or climbing out of the saddle or under hard cornering, even with just 16 spokes up front and 20 in the rear. For bigger riders, CarbonSports offers the front in a 20 spoke configuration; conversely, lighter riders can go with just 12.

As expected, that rigidity does yield a rather stiff ride but it wasn’t objectionable in most situations. Moreover, the supple Continental tubular tyres and carbon’s inherent damping characteristics did smooth things out. We might refrain from using these in a cyclo-cross for that reason (multiple world champion Hanka Kupfernagel has no problembg_registrierung with them) but found the Lightweights to be utterly fantastic on the road overall.

The wheels’ light weight pays the usual dividends. Acceleration from either a standstill or while already under way is as one would expect of a sub-1100g wheelset. In contrast to most true featherweights, though, the Lightweights are equally at home heading uphill, breaking speed limits down fast descents or hauling on the flats.
Speaking of speed, the aero shapes were noticeably effective as compared to non-aero wheels. Given the nature of physics, the Lightweights also offered an increasing advantage over those non-aero hoops as the speeds climbed. Crosswind performance expectedly suffers, though. With so much surface area and so little rotational inertia, the Lightweights are a definite handful when the winds are swirling, especially at high speeds.

Regardless of our perception, there’s some debate as to whether or not a V-shaped rim is as fast as a toroidal or airfoil-profiled rim but we won’t speculate without the benefit of a wind tunnel at our disposal. Even if the Lightweight profile carries with it a marginal aero penalty, we’d almost argue that their rigidity might very well make up for it under most non-time trial situations.

Braking performance was quite good, although CarbonSports adds no special surface treatment or texture to the Lightweights’ sidewalls. Much of the credit probably should go to the included brake pads which are specially made for CarbonSports by SwissStop. The grey compound pads are noticeably squishier than SwissStop’s own carbon-specific Yellow King blocks and yield a spongier feel at the lever but they worked surprisingly well with a marginally grabby initial bite and good modulation. We didn’t test them in thebg_test2 wet, unfortunately.

The sub-1100g weight would typically demand delicate treatment with a conventionally spoked wheel but we never had any durability issues with our Lightweights during four months of testing. Given the effectively one-piece construction and carbon’s inherent unwillingness to bend, there’s simply nothing to loosen up and no good reason to go out of true. Barring catastrophe or a joint failure, the Lightweights should stay that way for the duration and certainly did so for us. If not, wheels can be sent back to CarbonSports for repair … for a substantial fee, we’d imagine.
Mmm … yummy!

Cost issues aside, the Lightweights are quite possibly the finest race wheel we’ve sampled to date. There are others that are as light, as fast or as stiff but it’s extremely rare to find all of those qualities in one wheel. A head-to-head with substantially cheaper and seemingly similar Mavic’s Cosmic Carbone Ultimate might be in order here. CarbonSports even offers the Lightweight wheel in a clincher version. What’s not to like?

Oh, right. Stellar performance or not, £2150/US$4,500 is an astronomical price for a pair of wheels and the vast majority of general consumers would never dream of such anbg_laufraeder expenditure. Even so, the best argument in support of the Lightweights may come from the pros themselves. In spite of the wheels’ prevalence in the peloton, only Erik Zabel and Filippo Pozzato are officially supported by CarbonSports.

As such, riders such as Mario Cipollini, Paolo Bettini and even Lance Armstrong have reportedly had to buy their Lightweights out of either the team or personal budget. Apparently a set of rainbow stripes or a few yellow jerseys doesn’t buy much in Germany. Skeptics will be happy to hear that we’ve heard this from a number of sources outside of CarbonSports so we’re quite confident it’s factual.

In addition, virtually every one of those riders has to add a specific clause in their contracts allowing them to use Lightweights in competition and Bettini was supposedly fined a whopping US$40,000 or so for using them in the Italian national championships one year.

Fine, so they’re far from a bargain and well, well into the realm of diminishing returns. But if the current two-time world champion is willing to shell out US$40,000 for his pair, shouldn’t they be worth US$4,500 to you? Who ever said your kids had to go to college?

Click here for the range of Lightweight wheels on

Rotor_Logo-viNext up is Rotor, a collection of chainrings, bottom brackets and seatpost for us to feast upon. All of there products have very unique design features that  you would not of thought necessary for such items. All show the Spanish company’s attention to detail with a collection of solutions that solve some of the problems  found with today’s components.

Bike Radar did a review on what is the most well known products, there chainrings. This is what they had to say:

BikeRadar verdict [RATING:4]logo_bikeradar

“Feels more natural than a Biopace system”
By Paul Vincent

To some riders – most famously Lance Armstrong – pedalling fast is the best path to efficiency on the climbs. But now mere mortals can improve efficiency at more normal cadence speeds using the new Rotor Q-Rings.

If you have ever used the now defunct Shimano BioPace chainring system that was prevalent on bikes in the late 1980s you’ll know what to expect here in terms of sensation

The Q-Rings are available in either 130mm Shimano, 135mm Campagnolo or 110mm BCD (compact) chainring, with a fourth option also available for Microdrive Mtb cranksets using the 104/64mm BCD.

You’ll need to raise the front mech to account for the ovalisation and shifts between the small to the large chainring. While there were no problems on a bike fitted with a band-on front mech it may not be possible to raise the mech sufficiently on frames with a braze-on front mech mounting point. In use a couple of riders that I’d lent my cyclocross bike to didn’t actually notice anything out of the ordinary though I noticed an improvement in my ability to get up to speed after dismounting to negociate an obstacle on the course. It certainly feels more natural than a Biopace system though the jury’s still out on the benefits in terms of efficiency – we’ll let you know more in the spring after more extensive testing on the road.



A hub of reviews, advice and news from the online road cycling experts at ProBikeKit.